Daniel

Green Berets take untrained civilians and turn them into a cohesive force. They idea isnt that just the twelve man team makes it but that together the group makes it.

http://www.thedailysheeple.com/why-you-should-think-like-a-green-beret-instead-of-a-doomsday-prepper_022013      

http://www.tennessean.com/article/20130621/NEWS/306210145?nclick_check=1 New info. Seems drinks made to order and even sangria is g2g.

http://mobile.philly.com/news/opinion?wss=/philly/opinion&id=211490431 This is what I am referring too. I guess this ones first name isn't mentioned.

is he the one who spilled his secret in the back of a plane?

I was being facetious. I attended some of the hearings on it.

http://www.wsmv.com/story/22649504/bars-told-to-stop-serving-infused-alcoholic-drinks-after-2006-law   This guy plans to break the law. I seem to recall his name concerning something else.

Look, the FET is fine and all but I know what they have to do. They are not anywhere near as capable or trained.   We had one of ours fall down in a pile crying and had to be airlifted out that night when we got back to base because it was to dangerous. The male three person team she had just gotten out to to help  had been there for months and no one said a word about them going anywhere. 

This.   I had a soldier in my PSYOP unit tell me he was "awarded a CIB by a COL". I wanted to the choke the life out of him. He was standing in the wrong line or something but somehow thinks "he did the same thing as tne infantry." He does know he doesnt rightly have one he just kept the badge and likes to tell the story.

  You are CAPOC? CA? PO?   I seem to recall you had a negative opinion of PSYOP previously.

You pay 115 once and I think 50 to renew three years later.

GZ.

Why would he be afraid of a man walking down the street? By this I mean if TM was "standing his ground" what cause for fear did he have to do so?

He isn't a police officer. He was not conducting an official investigation. He was just a guy who saw something that looked funny and decided it was worth taking another look. He doesnt conduct terry stops as was mentioned earlier. He doesnt have RAS or PC requirements to ask someone a question. He doesnt have any restrictions to observe someone walking down a public sidewalk or in this case a private walk to which he was a paying resident of.

Investigate the unknown person roaming his neighborhood. Just as if I saw a random walking down my street I would watch to see where he was going. Double if I had a string of break-ins. That is just as a concerned citizen. As a neighborhood watch volunteer I would feel it was my duty to report and maintain visual contact. If I was watching someone and they took off running as they saw that I was observing them I  would be of the opinion that they ran because they were guilty of something.   If I noticed a person breaking into my neighbors house I would probably arm myself and walk outside to where I had a clear view of the home, any vehicle, any accomplices, and any further actions while I awaited the police. Seeing as I also have a flip camera I would probably pick that up to turn on and use as well.    Would I be in the wrong? If I was approached and attacked by said home intruders in a public street or sidewalk would I be expected to have my head bashed in because I decided that being a witness was more important than sitting back and letting people do whatever they want left unchecked?

Does that manual carry penalty of law? No? Then what does it matter. He isn't protected from anything based on his being a neighborhood watch volunteer.

Why do people keep saying that he had no "authority" to investigate?

Women's suffrage played out in Florida?

I am posting this after only getting to page 2. Ill read the rest and maybe amend.     At the risk of being labeled as something I am not I will relate a story.   When I was at South-Doyle Middle School in Knoxville we had a deck built in our backyard. A family friend, who was a brick mason primarily but knew enough carpentry to handle the job, did the work. He hired a friend of his to help him out.   A week after work was complete my grandfather, who lived up the street, noticed a car driving down in the middle of the day with three black guys in it. We lived on a dead end street and no one was anything but white. He saw them pull up to our yard and stop. At this point he walks inside, picks up a shotgun, and starts walking down the street. About one house down the car gives two quick honks and one of the occupants hurry's from our back yard and jumps in the car and they drive to the end of the road turn around haul ass out of there. My grandfather noted the make model and color and told us that afternoon. When we checked the back a tire iron was dropped beside the deck and we had pry marks on the door and frame. We told our friend the info and he said that it was his friend's brother's car by the description and that he was recently released from jail.   I relate this because at first glance these men were not doing anything illegal but yet based on prior history in our neighborhood they warranted a closer look. I do not fault George Zimmerman for watching and following Trayvon Martin. He was well within his legal rights and I think a moral obligation to do so. If you sit back and let your friends and neighbors be victims of crime I feel you are a poor excuse for a person.    Of course there is a line you should not cross. The question in this case to me is who crossed it? Did GZ attempt to break contact and was pursued or did he instigate the confrontation by more than just observing TM's actions and location?

If only.

I was going to enroll my son in Cub/Boy Scouts but I guess not. I didnt realize it was faith based. Oh well. Im not in to brain washing.

Deuteronomy 22:13-21 if your wife is not virgin the men of her city shall stone her to death   13"If any man takes a wife and(A) goes in to her and then hates her 14and accuses her of misconduct and brings a bad name upon her, saying, 'I took this woman, and when I came near her, I did not find in her evidence of virginity,' 15then the father of the young woman and her mother shall take and bring out the evidence of her virginity to the elders of the city in the gate. 16And the father of the young woman shall say to the elders, 'I gave my daughter to this man to marry, and he hates her; 17and behold, he has accused her of misconduct, saying, "I did not find in your daughter evidence of virginity." And yet this is the evidence of my daughter’s virginity.' And they shall spread the cloak before the elders of the city. 18Then the elders of that city shall take the man and whip[a] him, 19and they shall fine him a hundred shekels of silver and give them to the father of the young woman, because he has brought a bad name upon a virgin[c] of Israel. And she shall be his wife.(B) He may not divorce her all his days. 20But if the thing is true, that evidence of virginity was not found in the young woman, 21then they shall bring out the young woman to the door of her father’s house, and(C) the men of her city shall stone her to death with stones, because she has(D) done an outrageous thing in Israel by whoring in her father’s house.(E) So you shall purge the evil from your midst.

I have a 2011 or 10 model of that bike.

http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/topic/49806-road-bicycle/?hl=bicycle   http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/topic/33865-whazup-with-bicycles/?hl=bicycle   http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/topic/64254-road-rage/page-2?hl=bicycle#entry953917

Here we go again.