Gave it some more thought.
Here are a few arguments I've heard which have nothing to do with the truth of the statements made in the 2A.
1. The founders were in a state of evolution, creating their version of a right based on their "now" They just won and had a national interest, the new citizens pushing west had to evict the indigenous, and the police were days or decades away.
2.The founders could have never imagined the ingenuity of man to create the most lethal, effective killing small arms on the planet
3. References to what other learned, people have said, written, exposed upon regarding the 2A with the certainty these modern opinions are valid.
4. Charts and graphs showing the US is leading the world in killing civilians with small arms. If the founders saw this info the amendment would be different.
5. Public opinion polls show the amendment should be changed.
6. And the unspoken one, the influence of money through grants, donations, and lobbying.
Divert and deflect the argument with hand selected facts, you can eliminate truth from any narrative.